


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porter_generic_strategies
This is what AIESEC always said Organizational Strategy model, The originally name of "Product Leadership" is Differentiation Strategy ar ... Product Leadership is just AIESEC term or .. may be redefined term ar ..
Here is few explanation and criticize. We should also know what's the weaknesses when we are using some business model to support our organization...
Actually i also find something in the graph.. Do we have Uniqueness competency and Board Market Scope to be a Organization using differentiation as our Organization Strategy ?
Just raise the question, welcome to discuss ....but after exam.. hahaha
Differentiation Strategy
Differentiation involves creating a product that is perceived as
unique. The unique features or benefits should provide superior value
for the customer if this strategy is to be successful. Because
customers see the product as unrivaled and unequaled, the price elasticity of demand tends to be reduced and customers tend to be more brand
loyal. This can provide considerable insulation from competition.
However there are usually additional costs associated with the
differentiating product features and this could require a premium
pricing strategy.
To maintain this strategy the firm should have:
- strong research and development skills
- strong product engineering skills
- strong creativity skills
- good cooperation with distribution channels
- strong marketing skills
- incentives based on subjective measures
- be able to communicate the importance of the differentiating product characteristics
- stress continuous improvement and innovation
- attract highly skilled, creative people
Criticisms of generic strategies
Several commentators have questioned the use of generic strategies
claiming they lack specificity, lack flexibility, and are limiting. In
many cases trying to apply generic strategies is like trying to fit a
round peg into one of three square holes: You might get the peg into
one of the holes, but it will not be a good fit.
In particular, Millar (1992) questions the notion of being "caught
in the middle". He claims that there is a viable middle ground between
strategies. Many companies, for example, have entered a market as a
niche player and gradually expanded. According to Baden-Fuller and
Stopford (1992) the most successful companies are the ones that can
resolve what they call "the dilemma of opposites".
ok... finish 偷懒 .. back to revise..
888
Chatboard (0)